Gigabyte GA-P65Q

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	62.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P65Q (all builds)
Memory	16 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20170901
Uptime	5.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '23 at 07:40
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 74.2 1-Core 88 2-Core 162 63% 108 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 385 40% 323 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile Max-Q) 9,069 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Gigabyte(1458 1651) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	62.6% Good	Lighting 73.9 Reflection 97.9 Parallax 79.7 60% 83.8 fps	MRender 87.2 Gravity 76.2 Splatting 83 67% 82.1 fps
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 69%
Intel HD Graphics 630 310,249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 1651) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	4.82% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 5.9 Parallax 6.1 4% 5.73 fps	MRender 8.2 Gravity 5.5 Splatting 7.9 6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.82% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung NVMe MZVPV256HDGL-00000 256GB 5,877 User benchmarks, average bench 201% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,471 Write 772 Mixed 651 212% 965 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 65.9 4K Mixed 40.2 140% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 534 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 502 346% 435 MB/s
Poor: 133% Great: 247%
Ramsta R900 M.2 NVMe SSD 1TB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 192% 413GB free Firmware: RI20V0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 898 1125 1043 181 855 594 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	160% Outstanding	Read 1,288 Write 650 Mixed 674 SusWrite 782 189% 849 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 87.2 4K Mixed 20.9 128% 48.2 MB/s	DQ Read 700 DQ Write 358 DQ Mixed 388 326% 482 MB/s
Poor: 137% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 257%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-2666C18-16GRS Kingston CBD24D4S7S8MB-8 24GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2667, 2400 MHz 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.9% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 17.5 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 14.6 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	55	25	60	23.8"	1280 720	GSM5BB1 LG ULTRAGEAR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P65Q Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P65Q

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	26x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 61%, 9,069 samples	16x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	10x

SSD
THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 160%, 14,022 samples	9x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	4x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	3x

RAM
TN48G24S817-VHA/R 2x8GBUnknownBench 71%, 152 samples	10x
CBD24D4S7D8MA-16 1x16GBKingstonBench 42%, 134 samples	5x
F4-2666C18-16GRS Kingston CBD24D4S7S8MB-8 24GBUnknownBench 68%, 4 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16