PC ESL Tournament - 1070

Performance Results


Gaming 103% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 96% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	PC ESL Tournament - 1070 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II
Memory	25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180921
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '23 at 16:25
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$184 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 87 1-Core 132 2-Core 245 87% 155 Pts	4-Core 466 8-Core 789 76% 628 Pts	64-Core 1,001 62% 1,001 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$383 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3721) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	118% Outstanding	Lighting 159 Reflection 215 Parallax 126 130% 167 fps	MRender 178 Gravity 108 Splatting 118 108% 135 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 134%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33 20,095 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 279 262 169 278 285 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	167% Outstanding	Read 1,878 Write 1,059 Mixed 657 SusWrite 285 213% 970 MB/s	4K Read 47.7 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 41.4 144% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 821 DQ Write 551 DQ Mixed 617 479% 663 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 244%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GD3600C18K2D CM4X8GD3000C15K4 CM4X8GD3600C18K2D CM4X8GD3000C15K4 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	72.2% Very good	MC Read 26 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 21.9 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 29.5 SC Mixed 22.9 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	54.6"	1920 1080	SAM0D4F SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESL Tournament - 1070 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 69%

Battle cruiser

System: PC ESL Tournament - 1070

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $184Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	32x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $284Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	2x
Core i5-8500Intel $163Bench 82%, 43,089 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	5x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	3x

SSD
760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $33Bench 190%, 20,095 samples	22x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	2x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	1x

RAM
CM4X8GD3000C15K4 2x8GBCorsairBench 83%, 5,197 samples	17x
CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CM4X8GD3000C15K4 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CM4X8GD3000C15K4 32GBCorsairBench 89%, 100 samples	4x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $350

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16