Acer Elena

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive17.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Elena  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Elena
Memory20.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 23:27
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$85
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 87
2-Core 178
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 442
46% 372 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 113
Parallax 104
85% 107 fps
MRender 96
Gravity 103
Splatting 101
82% 99.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 114 82 84 126 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.3% Very poor
Read 0.2
Write 106
Mixed 11
SusWrite 98.2
12% 54 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 0.2
30% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 3.7
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 5.9
25% 50.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 85%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
41GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 188 184 87 38 125 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26% Poor
Read 146
Write 92.5
Mixed 76
SusWrite 134
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 9.4
37% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 15.7
DQ Write 16.8
DQ Mixed 106
55% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26%
Great: 100%
Kingston SA400S37240GB 240GB
53GB free
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 223 219 97 68 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.9% Average
Read 240
Write 202
Mixed 206
SusWrite 146
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 12
81% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 19.9
53% 112 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 ST102464BA1339.16F CT102464BA160B.C16 M378B5273CH0-CH9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.4% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 24" 1280 720 ACI2498 VS248
Typical Elena Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Elena

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $148
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback