Acer Elena

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	78.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	30.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Elena (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Elena
Memory	19.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110810
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '24 at 21:23
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	57%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$85 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Memory 84 1-Core 80.4 2-Core 154 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 355 40% 312 Pts	64-Core 418 26% 418 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.4% Very good	Lighting 94.6 Reflection 111 Parallax 101 77% 102 fps	MRender 92.6 Gravity 103 Splatting 100 81% 98.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 139 132 141 140 144 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.7% Below average	Read 204 Write 96.1 Mixed 84.7 SusWrite 132 29% 129 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 17.7 4K Mixed 14.3 42% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 27 DQ Write 27.8 DQ Mixed 23.8 19% 26.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 85%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$11 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 53GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 1.3 8.8 4.3 7.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 103 Write 13.7 Mixed 6 SusWrite 5.4 27% 32.1 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 50% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 ST102464BA1339.16F CT102464BA160B.C16 M378B5273CH0-CH9 24GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.8% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14.5 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 13.8 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	24"	1280 720	ACI2498 VS248

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Elena Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Elena

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $85Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	14x
Core i3-2120Intel $49Bench 51%, 77,810 samples	13x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	4x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	9x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	7x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	5x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $63Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	3x
CT102464BA160B.C16 ST102464BA1339.16F Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 24GBUnknownBench 47%, 3 samples	3x
CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GBUnknownBench 37%, 54 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $148

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363