Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171121
Uptime3 Days
Run DateDec 29 '23 at 19:51
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$136
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 65.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 212
70% 128 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 710
69% 567 Pts
64-Core 1,072
66% 1,072 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.64
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 6
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.8 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 108 103 102 106 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 208
Mixed 393
SusWrite 159
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 50.4
164% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 134%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
120GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 171 171 172 173 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 171
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 172
95% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
134% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMD16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMD16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
2134, 2134, 2134, 2134 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.3% Good
MC Read 27
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 24.4
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 21.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 110 60 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0B73 T24D391
Typical A320M Pro4 Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $254
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback