Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U Graphics 1,118 User benchmarks, average bench 52% FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Memory 40.6 1-Core 55.6 2-Core 101 38% 65.8 Pts	4-Core 163 8-Core 177 22% 170 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RadeonT 610M 75 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 380E) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.12.1 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	3.92% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 10 Parallax 9.3 2% 7.23 fps	MRender 6.7 Gravity 5.8 Splatting 13.9 8% 8.8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.92% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKCD512QFM-1BD1AABLA 512GB 1,136 User benchmarks, average bench 174% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1002V3LN SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 160 230 266 229 261 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.7% Poor	Read 275 Write 260 Mixed 251 SusWrite 211 56% 249 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 3.8 16% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 252%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 2x4GB 958 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 9.9 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 6.1 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 207 19% 207 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 75%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	3	138	47	60	14"	1296 759	LEN9021

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

CPU
Ryzen 3 7320U GraphicsAMDBench 52%, 1,118 samples	15x
Ryzen 5 7520U GraphicsAMDBench 53%, 1,439 samples	2x
Athlon Silver 7120U GraphicsAMDBench 25%, 130 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 2,063 samples	16x
RadeonT 610MAMDBench 6%, 75 samples	2x

SSD
MTFDKCD512QFM-1BD1AABLA 512GBMicronBench 174%, 1,136 samples	6x
MZAL4256HBJD-00BL2 256GBSamsungBench 146%, 356 samples	6x
RPJTJ128MEE1MWX 128GBUmisBench 123%, 883 samples	4x

RAM
K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 2x4GBSamsungBench 61%, 958 samples	10x
MT62F1G32D4DR-031 WT 2x4GBMicronBench 64%, 254 samples	8x