Asrock X670E Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics397% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsrock X670E Taichi  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Taichi
Memory53.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '24 at 07:17
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$475
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 76.2
1-Core 212
2-Core 423
121% 237 Pts
4-Core 826
8-Core 1,616
145% 1,222 Pts
64-Core 3639
225% 3639 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,500
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
397% Outstanding
Lighting 640
Reflection 583
Parallax 729
521% 650 fps
MRender 535
Gravity 576
Splatting 310
372% 474 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 397%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 4TB-$289
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,454
Write 4624
Mixed 3,445
793% 3,508 MB/s
4K Read 72.4
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 102
347% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,515
DQ Write 1,109
DQ Mixed 1,295
972% 1,306 MB/s
Poor: 306% Great: 619%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT64GX5M2B6800C40 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
243% Outstanding
MC Read 163
MC Write 55
MC Mixed 67.6
272% 95.1 GB/s
SC Read 47.4
SC Write 60.2
SC Mixed 51.4
151% 53 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 148%
This bench: 243%
Great: 243%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 27" 1280 720 HPN3673 OMEN 27i IPS
Typical X670E Taichi Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 297%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,320
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback