Asus H110M-E/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H110M-E/M.2  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170705
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 12 '24 at 23:30
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600T
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 198
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 331
43% 324 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon PRO W6300
Dell(1028 0E44) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.Q4
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
25.1% Poor
Lighting 30.1
Reflection 50.7
Parallax 50.7
24% 43.8 fps
MRender 43.5
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 23.8
26% 33.5 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S400 480GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0412A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 78 62 52 75 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 498
Write 327
Mixed 354
SusWrite 98.2
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.3
52% 12.2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST12000VN0008-2JH101 12TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 182 180 182 182 175 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
79.8% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 24.3
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 23
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7004 SAMSUNG
Typical H110M-E/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-E/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback