QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics81.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive28.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory23.8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 23.8GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory9.7 GB free of 23.8125 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '24 at 13:18
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 71%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Memory 43.7
1-Core 45.1
2-Core 83.1
34% 57.3 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 181
20% 158 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$495
Asus(1043 883B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.3% Excellent
Lighting 74.5
Reflection 126
Parallax 212
61% 137 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 147
Splatting 128
121% 151 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 158%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 1.5TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 131 125 99 110 138 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.2% Poor
Read 294
Write 378
Mixed 429
SusWrite 120
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 9.2
26% 7.93 MB/s
DQ Read 15.4
DQ Write 22.8
DQ Mixed 12.5
11% 16.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 23GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 8000 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 21.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 17 81 7 144 27" 1280 720 ACI27EC ROG PG279Q
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback