Asrock B250 Gaming K4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B250 Gaming K4  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '24 at 14:50
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 142
58% 98 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 309
38% 289 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
ASRock(1849 1912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
2.94% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 4.8
4% 4.57 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.94%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WDS120G2G0B- 120GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 41 46 29 16 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 6.5
Write 60.8
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 38.2
20% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
30% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
8GB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 138
Write 143
Mixed 72.9
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34
76GB free
Firmware: AX101U
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 81.3
Write 86.8
Mixed 29.9
48% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Seagate Portable 500GB
1GB free, PID 2332
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.4
Write 29.3
Mixed 28.1
39% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
42% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 40%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
85GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 137
Write 140
Mixed 21.1
116% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
165% 2 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
28.3% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 7.8
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 0P 5R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 30% 37 55 25 60 50.1" 1280 720 HEC3257 LHDN32V88AU
Typical B250 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B250 Gaming K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $445
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback