Lenovo 83FS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 83FS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '24 at 18:16
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 69.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 249
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 485
54% 424 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F93) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.06% Terrible
Lighting 9.8
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 13.9
8% 13.2 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 15
Splatting 11.6
11% 13.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.06%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ512MKP1QDY 512GB
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1L06A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 549 838 696 1136 1347 1184 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 994
Write 1,246
Mixed 921
SusWrite 958
233% 1030 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 25.9
142% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 645
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 531
378% 491 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 161%
Great: 328%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44CB0-CWE M471A1G44CB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 27.4
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 23.3
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 9 60 15.5" 1920 1017 CMN1550
Typical 83FS Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 83FS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback