Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire Lite AL15-41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire Lite AL15-41  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire Lite AL15-41
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230808
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateJan 21 '24 at 06:33
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 69.2
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 130
55% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 510
50% 411 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Clevo(1558 A600) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.37.05
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
7.86% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 17.4
6% 13 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 16.7
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.86%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison ESO512GMLCT-E9C 512GB
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM32.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1180 940 1009 523 920 803 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 976
Write 1,216
Mixed 837
SusWrite 896
222% 981 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 37.5
107% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 671
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 524
389% 521 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 151%
Great: 322%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMB6-DGDA1BAR08D00 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.3% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 27.7
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 21.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 44 60 15.5" 1536 864 BOE0812
Typical Aspire Lite AL15-41 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire Lite AL15-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback