Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire Lite AL15-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive322% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire Lite AL15-51  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire Lite AL15-51
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 08:38
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i5-1155G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 67.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 262
84% 157 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 523
59% 461 Pts
64-Core 589
36% 589 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Clevo(1558 4050) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 24
16% 19.9 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 16
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison ESO512GMLCT-E9C 512GB
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM32.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2655 2568 2742 2034 878 824 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
322% Outstanding
Read 1,596
Write 2,775
Mixed 1,605
SusWrite 1,950
450% 1,982 MB/s
4K Read 66.9
4K Write 229
4K Mixed 83.6
330% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 987
DQ Write 758
DQ Mixed 876
654% 874 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 322%
Great: 322%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Gold Key Co Ltd NMSO480E82-3200E 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.4% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 14.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 30 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0812
Typical Aspire Lite AL15-51 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire Lite AL15-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback