Gigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 166%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory43.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '24 at 20:24
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$250
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 70.6
1-Core 162
2-Core 306
95% 180 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 1,056
96% 805 Pts
64-Core 1,640
102% 1,640 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,104
Gigabyte(1458 4043) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
196% Outstanding
Lighting 282
Reflection 287
Parallax 296
230% 288 fps
MRender 339
Gravity 241
Splatting 184
200% 255 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 196%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-AG70S1TB 1TB
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM21.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1111 829 1068 881 806 859 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,276
Write 1,454
Mixed 726
SusWrite 926
246% 1,095 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 48.3
183% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 849
DQ Write 1,032
DQ Mixed 878
680% 920 MB/s
Poor: 211%
This bench: 205%
Great: 512%
External USB3.0 DISK04 16TB
353GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.5% Poor
Read 103
Write 11.7
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 0
34% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.7
147% 5.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 22%
External USB3.0 DISK03 16TB
642GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.9% Poor
Read 54.5
Write 34.9
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 0.1
34% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.2
211% 6.47 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 48%
External USB3.0 DISK00 16TB
8TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.5% Very poor
Read 50.7
Write 35.5
Mixed 31.4
SusWrite 0
35% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.3
185% 6.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 67%
External USB3.0 DISK02 16TB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.9% Poor
Read 34.5
Write 36.7
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 20.5
40% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.4
251% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 83%
External USB3.0 DISK01 16TB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.2% Poor
Read 59.4
Write 30.7
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 20.5
42% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.7
229% 6.13 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 75%
External USB3.0 DISK00 16TB
6TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 43 38 32 11 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 238
Write 77.2
Mixed 135
SusWrite 34.6
138% 121 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.5
192% 6.07 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 141%
External USB3.0 DISK01 16TB
7GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 114 135 192 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 255
Write 115
Mixed 201
SusWrite 133
223% 176 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 1.4
370% 9.33 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 93%
External USB3.0 DISK02 16TB
7GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 114 129 165 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 229
Write 102
Mixed 221
SusWrite 126
218% 169 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 1
484% 6.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1.3
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 1.7
532% 5.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
External USB3.0 DISK03 16TB
7GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 264
Write 196
Mixed 59.2
195% 173 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 1
524% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 2
DQ Write 13.2
DQ Mixed 1.4
504% 5.53 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 131%
External USB3.0 DISK04 16TB
7GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 197
Write 256
Mixed 188
281% 214 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 1.3
555% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 3
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 1.6
535% 6.13 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GTZR 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
63.3% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 20.3
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 18.6
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27" 1280 720 BNQ7F2B BenQ XL2720Z
Typical GA-Z590 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 2,896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 187%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $885
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback