Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS 3,338 User benchmarks, average bench 79% FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 61.9 1-Core 102 2-Core 188 65% 118 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 670 65% 535 Pts	64-Core 1,128 70% 1,128 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RadeonT 680M 358 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Legend(17AA 381F) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.46.02 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.5% Poor	Lighting 32 Reflection 47.3 Parallax 59.7 26% 46.3 fps	MRender 22 Gravity 36.9 Splatting 46.8 30% 35.2 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 34%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL2 1TB 10,270 User benchmarks, average bench 363% 840GB free (System drive) Firmware: CL1QGXA7 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,799 Write 1,383 Mixed 1,476 345% 1,553 MB/s	4K Read 47.6 4K Write 79.1 4K Mixed 57.1 187% 61.3 MB/s	DQ Read 696 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 508 360% 470 MB/s
Poor: 201% Great: 458%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 4x4GB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	84% Excellent	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 30.8 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 30.6 SC Mixed 21 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 137%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	28	4	120	14.5"	1536 889	LEN8AB1

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

CPU
Ryzen 7 7735HSAMDBench 79%, 3,338 samples	12x
Ryzen 5 7535HS GraphicsAMDBench 82%, 2,625 samples	1x

GPU
RadeonT 680MAMDBench 26%, 358 samples	9x
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPUNvidiaBench 55%, 1,388 samples	3x
RadeonT 660MAMDBench 15%, 71 samples	1x

SSD
MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL2 1TBSamsungBench 363%, 10,270 samples	6x
SKHynix_HFS512GEJ9X115N 512GBBench 342%, 1,595 samples	3x
MTFDKBA512TFH 512GBMicronBench 286%, 1,522 samples	1x

RAM
MT62F1G32D4DR-031 WT 4x4GBMicronBench 103%, 3,866 samples	11x
H58G56AK6BX069 4x4GBHynixBench 85%, 139 samples	2x