Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMACHINIST
MotherboardMACHINIST E5-MR9A
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231110
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 23 '24 at 20:40
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 159
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 526
51% 420 Pts
64-Core 1,105
68% 1,105 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
PNY(196E 11D8) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.2% Above average
Lighting 62.7
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 60.4
51% 62.8 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 65.1
Splatting 59.1
51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 512GB SSD 512GB
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0414A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 760 812 825 828 850 845 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,609
Write 767
Mixed 866
SusWrite 820
226% 1,016 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 23.7
105% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 449
DQ Write 481
DQ Mixed 414
326% 448 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 166%
Great: 235%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
311GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 100 101 101 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 114
Write 116
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 100
73% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.1% Good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 21.1
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 75 23.8" 1280 720 ACR0772 V247Y
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback