Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics91% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMACHINIST
MotherboardMACHINIST E5-MR9A PRO
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231110
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 09 '24 at 22:36
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 189
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 724
64% 545 Pts
64-Core 1,678
104% 1,678 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$359
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Lighting 89.7
Reflection 136
Parallax 182
73% 136 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 93.2
Splatting 166
126% 153 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 91%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002 500GB
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1755 1746 1686 1806 1816 1824 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1342
Write 1,526
Mixed 1,394
SusWrite 1,772
342% 1,509 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 50.1
159% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 703
DQ Write 372
DQ Mixed 592
425% 555 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 235%
Great: 387%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 86 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 84.9
Write 83.6
Mixed 52
SusWrite 86.6
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-UH 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.9% Very good
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 26.8
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.8
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 27.2" 1280 720 HWP3107 HP E271i
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback