Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A520M K V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520M K V2  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '24 at 11:35
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 210
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 586
61% 491 Pts
64-Core 746
46% 746 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
Sapphire(1DA2 E426) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.1% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 198
Parallax 199
99% 173 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 139
Splatting 94
93% 116 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 104%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dahua C800 2.5 inch SATA 512GB SSD
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0714A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 310
Write 364
Mixed 328
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 16.8
88% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 44.1
86% 168 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX4U32008G16A-DTBKD3 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 36.3
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 29.5
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical GA-A520M K V2 Builds (Compare 450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M K V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback