Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8392
Memory17.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210705
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '24 at 16:27
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 184
64% 115 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 477
46% 381 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
HP(103C 8392) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5123
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.1% Poor
Lighting 30.4
Reflection 44.5
Parallax 28.3
25% 34.4 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 34.2
Splatting 25.5
26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
86GB free
Firmware: V9001b31 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 608 648 611 344 110 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,249
Write 729
Mixed 710
SusWrite 404
172% 773 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 38.3
132% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 508
DQ Mixed 448
332% 432 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 134%
Great: 244%
Adata SU630 240GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X14c18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 32 23 11 17 24 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.1% Poor
Read 116
Write 93.2
Mixed 117
SusWrite 28.3
20% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 8.6
34% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 87.4
DQ Mixed 114
87% 119 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6D1 8502 PSD416G26662S 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.2% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 10.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 10.9
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 28 60 17.2" 1280 720 CMN1738
Typical OMEN Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback