Today's hottest deals

Asus B85-A R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus B85-A R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '24 at 10:48
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$118
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Memory 24.4
1-Core 16.4
2-Core 32.5
16% 24.4 Pts
4-Core 28
8-Core 41
4% 34.5 Pts
64-Core 43.3
3% 43.3 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Asus(1043 051D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1256 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.9% Below average
Lighting 47.3
Reflection 35.7
Parallax 73.8
38% 52.3 fps
MRender 58.7
Gravity 60.8
Splatting 41.3
43% 53.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 128G 128GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07985
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 222 236 246 144 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 330
Write 228
Mixed 271
SusWrite 191
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 9.7
32% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 90.4
DQ Mixed 114
81% 104 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
210GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 97 96 96 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 108
Write 42.6
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 95.6
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 76%
Generic External 1TB
456GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 33 36 35 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 34.4
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 33.8
40% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-YK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
24.8% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 10.9
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 6.1
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 1R 3G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 17% 70 180 28 60 23.1" 1920 1017 GSM581D E2341
Typical B85-A R2.0 Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus B85-A R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $176
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback