Today's hottest deals

Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory18.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200715
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMar 03 '24 at 08:26
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 217
70% 127 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 426
57% 429 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.1% Average
Lighting 59.4
Reflection 57.8
Parallax 79.1
48% 65.4 fps
MRender 58.9
Gravity 65.5
Splatting 43.4
45% 55.9 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 128G 128GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12015
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 405 416 422 422 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 455
Mixed 437
SusWrite 381
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 41.2
146% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 172
141% 194 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 96%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
162GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 78 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 96.8
Write 94
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 78.3
59% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GU881-32N220A Kingston HX424C15FB/16 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.1% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 20.1
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 20.6
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 187 12 60 18.9" 1440 837 SGT1900
Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback