Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics297% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E12
MotherboardMSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)  (all builds)
Memory81 GB free of 96 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230327
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 18:15
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$487
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 72.1
1-Core 215
2-Core 421
120% 236 Pts
4-Core 847
8-Core 1668
149% 1,258 Pts
64-Core 3,787
234% 3,787 Pts
Poor: 104%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$1,000
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.31
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
297% Outstanding
Lighting 450
Reflection 445
Parallax 470
367% 455 fps
MRender 520
Gravity 392
Splatting 257
304% 390 fps
Poor: 283%
This bench: 297%
Great: 314%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 4TB-$275
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,039
Write 4815
Mixed 3,523
786% 3,459 MB/s
4K Read 72
4K Write 211
4K Mixed 106
356% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,771
DQ Write 1,367
DQ Mixed 1,574
1,176% 1,570 MB/s
Poor: 303% Great: 616%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6400J3239F48G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
151% Outstanding
MC Read 56.2
MC Write 52.8
MC Mixed 54.1
155% 54.4 GB/s
SC Read 47.9
SC Write 64.2
SC Mixed 50.8
155% 54.3 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 151%
This bench: 151%
Great: 331%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 0P 2R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 11% 102 214 53 180 27" 1280 720 ACR0C97 XV272U V3
Typical MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12) Builds (Compare 316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 337%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 342%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback