Asus P8Z77-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151218
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 02 '24 at 20:22
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 182
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 449
47% 377 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.6% Very good
Lighting 99.7
Reflection 162
Parallax 101
81% 121 fps
MRender 99.1
Gravity 99
Splatting 85.2
76% 94.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT09B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 213 231 241 241 236 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.7% Above average
Read 237
Write 233
Mixed 143
SusWrite 213
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 20.5
78% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 53.4
78% 144 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 85%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 106 103 106 107 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 357
Write 118
Mixed 144
SusWrite 102
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 21.7
88% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 73.8
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 80.4
65% 90.1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 859B BLS8G3D1609ES2LX0. KHX1866C10D3/8G 859B BLS8G3D1609ES2LX0. 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.4% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.3
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 84.6" 1920 1017 MEIA296 Panasonic-TV
Typical P8Z77-M Builds (Compare 1,292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback