Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU_GU502GU

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU_GU502GU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GU502GU
Memory	11.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210105
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 10 '24 at 18:22
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 70.3 1-Core 87.5 2-Core 185 64% 114 Pts	4-Core 398 8-Core 616 63% 507 Pts	64-Core 775 48% 775 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 101F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	2.55% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 3.6 Parallax 3.2 2% 3.17 fps	MRender 4.2 Gravity 2.9 Splatting 4.5 3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.55% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 924 584 451 382 351 346 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	160% Outstanding	Read 1,090 Write 1256 Mixed 1,136 SusWrite 506 224% 997 MB/s	4K Read 45 4K Write 76.8 4K Mixed 55 179% 58.9 MB/s	DQ Read 770 DQ Write 568 DQ Mixed 669 500% 669 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 360GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1277 1116 1213 1228 1219 1214 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	209% Outstanding	Read 1,171 Write 1,319 Mixed 1,114 SusWrite 1,211 272% 1,204 MB/s	4K Read 45.2 4K Write 78.1 4K Mixed 56.1 182% 59.8 MB/s	DQ Read 776 DQ Write 622 DQ Mixed 688 518% 695 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 209% Great: 435%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 859B CT16G4SFRA266.M16FRS 24GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 10.6 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 12.4 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	54	240	15.5"	1280 720	SHP14D3 LQ156M1JW09

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Zephyrus M GU502GU_GU502GU Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

System: Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU_GU502GU

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	363x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	196x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	167x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	251x
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	10x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $70Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	6x

RAM
M471A2G43AB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 41%, 5,740 samples	164x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GBMicronBench 74%, 5,735 samples	56x
M471A2G43AB1-CTD M471A2K43DB1-CTD 32GBSamsungBench 78%, 707 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16