HP HPE-410fr

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP HPE-410fr (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2A9C
Memory	5.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100712
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '24 at 10:40
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 93.2 1-Core 84 2-Core 162 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 356 40% 312 Pts	64-Core 359 22% 359 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Zotac(19DA 730B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 473.81 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	5% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 4.7 Parallax 7.8 5% 6.2 fps	MRender 3.8 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 7 5% 6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB 12,396 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 464GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415020RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 164 216 215 215 219 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.7% Above average	Read 220 Write 221 Mixed 200 SusWrite 208 48% 212 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 43.6 4K Mixed 23.1 78% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 187 144% 195 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 118%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB 11,642 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 414GB free Firmware: 06.01D06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 96 96 97 97 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 95.8 Write 92.7 Mixed 80.8 SusWrite 96.3 68% 91.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 75%
Seagate ST3500830AS 500GB-$145 6,517 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 235GB free Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 61 62 62 63 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 101 Write 30.3 Mixed 48.7 SusWrite 61.1 45% 60.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 44%
USB 500GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 137GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 73 73 74 73 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 68.8 Write 64.5 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 73 42% 58 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 61%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB 1,824 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 893GB free Firmware: 1402 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.2 5.2 5.1 5.2 5.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 51.5 Write 25.3 Mixed 24.9 SusWrite 5.1 20% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 1 188% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 67%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB 31,958 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 160GB free Firmware: 0209 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Read 51.3 Write 24.1 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 5.1 19% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.8 137% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 57%
WD My Book 500GB 3,986 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 466GB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.2 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	9.23% Terrible	Read 53.4 Write 21.4 Mixed 21 SusWrite 5.2 28% 25.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.8 33% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.23% Great: 22%
Packard Bell Carbon 1TB 425 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 673GB free, PID 0017 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.1 5 5 5 5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	9.52% Terrible	Read 54.9 Write 20.4 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 5.1 28% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.8 34% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.52% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
CE80CE80 M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 9B052C80 CT51264BD160B.C16F 9B052C80 CT51264BD160B.C16F 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.4% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 9.8 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 10.8 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	22"	1280 720	GSM5677 W2242

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical HPE-410fr Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP HPE-410fr

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	6x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	1x
GeForce GT 240NvidiaBench 4%, 11,020 samples	1x

SSD
S3 1T00 1TBSandiskBench 95%, 12,396 samples	3x

RAM
M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 9B052C80 CT51264BD160B.C16F 9B052C80 CT51264BD160B.C16F 12GBCE80CE80Bench 30%, 3 samples	3x
8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 018 AE34G1339U2 2C802C80 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 018 AE34G1339U2 12GBUnknownBench 29%, 2 samples	1x
M378B5773CH0-CH9 2x2GBCE80CE80Bench 29%, 185 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $70

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16