Today's hottest deals

Microelectronics G352

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicroelectronics G352  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME Z370-P
Memory14.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180702
Uptime9.6 Days
Run DateMar 22 '24 at 19:17
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 207
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 705
65% 545 Pts
64-Core 962
60% 962 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$301
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 169
Parallax 158
144% 168 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 128
Splatting 113
110% 138 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 126%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 324 323 341 338 336 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 77% Great: 123%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
380GB free
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1526 1574 1575 1636 1594 1604 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2142
Write 2019
Mixed 1,905
SusWrite 1,585
430% 1,913 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 57
197% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 809
DQ Write 612
DQ Mixed 710
531% 711 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 275%
Great: 623%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
67GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 121 121 123 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70% Very good
Read 122
Write 112
Mixed 68
SusWrite 121
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70%
Great: 109%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
277GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 145 145 143 148 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 150
Write 124
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 145
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.9
351% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Neo Forza NMUD480E82-3000 Forza NMUD480E82-3000 Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 27.8
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 34.5
SC Mixed 26.8
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 0P 3R 6G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 34% 47 213 57 60 21.7" 1280 720 SAC952D LED MONITOR
Typical G352 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

System: Microelectronics G352

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $469
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $105Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback