Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230914
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 26 '24 at 19:45
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 50.9
1-Core 129
2-Core 221
71% 134 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 516
57% 449 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.94% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 16.7
9% 14.2 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 13.8
Splatting 14.9
12% 13.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.94%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CE480V6D10H-512G 512GB
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.4.6.48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 278 270 281 281 272 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 907
Write 278
Mixed 354
SusWrite 276
100% 454 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 34.1
165% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 159
166% 276 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 284%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4S16G32C22ST 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.2% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 16
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 18.7
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0P 1R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 20% 20 79 23 60 24" 1920 1080 BNQ78CE BenQ GL2460
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,219 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback