PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R (all builds) |
Memory | 6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090901 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Mar 30 '24 at 12:10 |
Run Duration | 213 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 99% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
|
40.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.4%
Poor
|
|||
Nvidia Quadro P400
HP(103C 11BE) 2GB
CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.33
|
8.94%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 134 148 142 128 133 MB/s
|
43.6%
Average
|
|||
ST12000NM001G-2MV103 12TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 134 147 140 127 133 MB/s
|
24.8%
Poor
|
|||
Realtek RTL9210 NVME 1TB
850GB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 95 104 99 95 94 MB/s
|
26.5%
Poor
|
|||
Hitachi HUH721212ALE601 12TB
7TB free
Firmware: LEGL0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 124 136 128 121 125 MB/s
|
85.8%
Excellent
|
|||
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
161GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 6 5.5 7.4 7.1 5.3 MB/s
|
2.7%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM
|
33.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 68 | 57 | 60 | 21.7" | 1280 720 | FL_2701 HDMI2K |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 290x |
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples | 27x |
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 26x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 28x |
RX 580AMD $131Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 27x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 23x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $374 |