Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090901
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 30 '24 at 12:10
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 99%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 66.1
1-Core 29.2
2-Core 56.7
35% 50.7 Pts
4-Core 85.4
8-Core 125
13% 105 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.4% Poor
Lighting 32.2
Reflection 33.4
Parallax 32.9
26% 32.8 fps
MRender 32.4
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 23.5
24% 29.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 33%
Nvidia Quadro P400
HP(103C 11BE) 2GB
CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
8.94% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 9.4
9% 11 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 10
Splatting 12.2
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.94%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 134 148 142 128 133 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.6% Average
Read 192
Write 177
Mixed 185
SusWrite 134
39% 172 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 21
66% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 156
117% 158 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 134%
ST12000NM001G-2MV103 12TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 134 147 140 127 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 185
Write 174
Mixed 98.6
SusWrite 132
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 1.6
32% 8.97 MB/s
DQ Read 17.3
DQ Write 16
DQ Mixed 2.3
6% 11.9 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 44%
Realtek RTL9210 NVME 1TB
850GB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 95 104 99 95 94 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.5% Poor
Read 114
Write 96.3
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 95.2
23% 101 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 13.5
40% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 79.2
DQ Write 70.5
DQ Mixed 91.2
64% 80.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 131%
Hitachi HUH721212ALE601 12TB
7TB free
Firmware: LEGL0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 124 136 128 121 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 175
Write 166
Mixed 90.1
SusWrite 123
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.4
304% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 139%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
161GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 6 5.5 7.4 7.1 5.3 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.7% Terrible
Read 3
Write 5.7
Mixed 4
SusWrite 6.4
4% 4.78 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 2.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
33.9% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 13.2
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 60 21.7" 1280 720 FL_2701 HDMI2K
Typical GA-EX58-UD3R Builds (Compare 490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback