Today's hottest deals

Asrock B550 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B550 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '24 at 15:13
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$227
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 177
2-Core 346
111% 206 Pts
4-Core 684
8-Core 1,302
118% 993 Pts
64-Core 2,219
137% 2,219 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 111%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$397
Asus(1043 87BB) ≥ 4GB; asus
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 169
Parallax 161
147% 170 fps
MRender 177
Gravity 138
Splatting 120
116% 145 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 129%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NS100 1TB
882GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN13132
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 379 375 370 373 375 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 488
Mixed 445
SusWrite 378
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 48.5
182% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 290
215% 283 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
MSI M480 1TB
895GB free
Firmware: EIFM21.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1379 1389 1388 1390 1391 1394 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 1,128
Write 1,367
Mixed 1,232
SusWrite 1,388
290% 1,279 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 95.7
318% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,388
DQ Write 1,234
DQ Mixed 1,297
976% 1,306 MB/s
Poor: 179%
This bench: 287%
Great: 481%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$95
759GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 408 408 410 409 409 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 495
Mixed 466
SusWrite 408
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 68.8
229% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 374
281% 375 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 134%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4U0836182B 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
135% Outstanding
MC Read 60.3
MC Write 45.2
MC Mixed 45.3
144% 50.3 GB/s
SC Read 31.7
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 43.4
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 135%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0P 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 12% 16 176 7 360 24.5" 1920 1017 BNQ7FB7 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical B550 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock B550 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $684
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback