Acer Aspire A515-58GM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-58GM  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL KellyG_RTU
Memory5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231127
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateApr 08 '24 at 15:28
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1335U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 36.7
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 186
55% 106 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 512
48% 397 Pts
64-Core 706
44% 706 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Acer(1025 1693) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 13.2
9% 14.1 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 14.4
14% 17.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014 512GB
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101100 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1057 1114 1017 1078 1071 1089 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1369
Write 1069
Mixed 1,042
SusWrite 1071
255% 1,138 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 29.4
131% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 412
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 315
231% 309 MB/s
Poor: 217%
This bench: 173%
Great: 480%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77% Very good
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 28.4
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 15.3
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 225
18% 225 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 4 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD0739
Typical Aspire A515-58GM Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire A515-58GM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback