Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS M  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '24 at 00:38
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 84.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 244
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 827
78% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,238
77% 1,238 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 130
Parallax 81.7
97% 110 fps
MRender 77
Gravity 125
Splatting 90.4
80% 97.4 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 91%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 278 274 296 295 281 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 302
Mixed 303
SusWrite 285
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 38.7
144% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 250
212% 312 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 128%
CT2000T500SSD8 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: P8CR002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 804 1215 355 472 919 426 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,297
Write 2401
Mixed 2,071
SusWrite 698
419% 1,867 MB/s
4K Read 65.2
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 71.9
261% 89.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1020
DQ Write 678
DQ Mixed 897
656% 865 MB/s
Poor: 252%
This bench: 252%
Great: 682%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
854GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 138 136 151 148 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 175
Mixed 110
SusWrite 145
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$32
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 43.5
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 33.7
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 28.4
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 31.6
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 27 9 144 24.5" 1280 720 HPN3425 OMEN by HP 25
Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 8,074 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $430
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback