Today's hottest deals

Geekom Mini Air12

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGeekom Mini Air12  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 11:25
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 58.6
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 191
63% 115 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 354
47% 353 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 4.4
3% 5.03 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 7.9
5% 5.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wodposit NVMe SSD 512GB
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APF1M3R1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1014
Write 1,948
Mixed 1,326
323% 1,429 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 61.4
199% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,031
DQ Write 856
DQ Mixed 932
701% 940 MB/s
Poor: 127% Great: 297%
SAMSUNG SP2504C 250GB
156GB free, PID fcbf
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 30.8
Write 31.8
Mixed 28.3
39% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G56C46S5.M8D1 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.5% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 23.4
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 17.2
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 23.9" 1280 720 ENC2531 EV2450
Typical Mini Air12 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Geekom Mini Air12

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback