Intel X99-P3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics38% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemINTEL
MotherboardIntel X99-P3  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 11:01
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2676 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 147
60% 100 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 586
52% 439 Pts
64-Core 1206
75% 1206 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.12027.9001
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38% Below average
Lighting 44.9
Reflection 53
Parallax 71.6
37% 56.5 fps
MRender 54.2
Gravity 56.7
Splatting 42
41% 51 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BR 512GB 512GB
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0824A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1670 1647 1660 1664 1661 1665 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,760
Write 1,662
Mixed 1,195
SusWrite 1,661
353% 1,569 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 28.5
152% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 604
DQ Write 378
DQ Mixed 476
359% 486 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 238%
Great: 233%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 93 94 93 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 93.8
Write 94.3
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 93.6
65% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 52%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
717GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 52.8
Write 29.1
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 29.1
41% 33 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
47% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70EB0-YK0 2x16GB
2 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 18.3
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 16.7
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 10 60 20.1" 1680 987 SAM0444 SyncMaster
Typical X99-P3 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99-P3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback