Huananzhi A_M_I_

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHuananzhi A_M_I_  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-BD3
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20220610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 14:26
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 188
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 733
62% 536 Pts
64-Core 1,223
76% 1,223 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 20.9
15% 19.4 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 19.7
Splatting 17.7
15% 17.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KW51 512GB
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 412 432 423 427 429 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 428
Mixed 415
SusWrite 422
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 65.4
216% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 60.7
118% 234 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 126%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70EB0-YK0 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.6% Average
MC Read 23
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 17.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 12.9
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A_M_I_ Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Huananzhi A_M_I_

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback