HP OMEN Transcend Gaming Laptop 14-fb0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN Transcend Gaming Laptop 14-fb0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8C58
Memory5.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240109
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 16:45
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 7.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 52.5
1-Core 166
2-Core 311
90% 176 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 843
86% 696 Pts
64-Core 1,349
84% 1,349 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics
HP(103C 8C58) 1GB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5008
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 31.9
15% 21.7 fps
MRender 21.1
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 25.8
19% 22.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN810 SDCPNRY-1T00-1006 1TB
819GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,754
Write 1,846
Mixed 1,852
476% 2,151 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 63.3
218% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 679
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 508
360% 470 MB/s
Poor: 184% Great: 533%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7467 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
171% Outstanding
MC Read 69
MC Write 65.5
MC Mixed 76.8
201% 70.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 26.5
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 109%
This bench: 171%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 200 24" 1280 720 AUS24B1 ROG PG248Q
Typical OMEN Transcend Gaming Laptop 14-fb0xxx Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: HP OMEN Transcend Gaming Laptop 14-fb0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback