Samsung 960XGL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSamsung 960XGL  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP960XGL-XG3DE
Memory4 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240304
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMar 15 '24 at 16:38
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 9.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 53.3
1-Core 192
2-Core 358
102% 201 Pts
4-Core 607
8-Core 1,068
101% 837 Pts
64-Core 1,856
115% 1,856 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1D8) 128MB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5234
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 28.4
Parallax 70.8
32% 45.9 fps
MRender 30.8
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 63.6
41% 48.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B 512GB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7GK2Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,846
Write 3,164
Mixed 2,849
662% 2,953 MB/s
4K Read 69.5
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 91.6
304% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1376
DQ Write 976
DQ Mixed 1,141
862% 1,164 MB/s
Poor: 162% Great: 413%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7467 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
165% Outstanding
MC Read 69.7
MC Write 56
MC Mixed 74.3
190% 66.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 24.5
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 165%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 14 60 16" 1920 1200 SDC4188
Typical 960XGL Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Samsung 960XGL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback