Pcspecialist Amd Am4 Gen3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemPcspecialist Amd Am4 Gen3  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210319
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 16:24
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 66.1
1-Core 139
2-Core 256
82% 153 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 805
78% 643 Pts
64-Core 889
55% 889 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 2489) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 158
Parallax 142
130% 153 fps
MRender 171
Gravity 124
Splatting 110
108% 135 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 118%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$79
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,683
Write 1,891
Mixed 106
340% 1,560 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 49.5
185% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 823
DQ Write 47.5
DQ Mixed 98.1
156% 323 MB/s
Poor: 137% Great: 383%
256gb PCS 2.5" SSD 256GB
175GB free
Firmware: U0119A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 499
Write 425
Mixed 392
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 25.8
124% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 38
95% 194 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 96%
Seagate One Touch HDD 1TB
348GB free
Firmware: 1707
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37.9
Write 40.4
Mixed 35.4
28% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
96% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMWX8GD3600C18W2D CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMWX8GD3600C18W2D 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 24.1
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 23.8
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 0P 3R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 30% 44 216 59 144 24" 1280 720 ACI24A4 VG248
Typical Amd Am4 Gen3 Builds (Compare 421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

System: Pcspecialist Amd Am4 Gen3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $495
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback