Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-1799

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GP72M 7REX
MotherboardMSI MS-1799  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 20:09
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 69.4
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 172
63% 111 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 504
51% 414 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11C9) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5244
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.2% Below average
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 46.5
Parallax 38
32% 41 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 26.2
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
714GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1085 1060 1075 1089 1011 1011 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,675
Write 1,354
Mixed 1,233
SusWrite 1,055
298% 1,329 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 52.7
171% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 622
DQ Write 372
DQ Mixed 527
384% 507 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 207%
Great: 410%
SamsungSSD870EVO1000GB 1TB
787GB free
Firmware: hp2818d5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 299 302 305 290 284 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.9% Good
Read 417
Write 324
Mixed 288
SusWrite 296
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 9.2
88% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 13.8
66% 144 MB/s
Adata SX 8200PNP 512GB
106GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 304 256 299 298 238 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 326
Write 300
Mixed 305
SusWrite 282
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 26.3
85% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 161
121% 161 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 91%
SDHC Card 32GB
11GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 52.1
Write 24.6
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 25.7
38% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1.6
97% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF424S14IBK2/32 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.7% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 22.5
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 17.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 170 10 120 34" 2293 897 LHCFFFF X340 PRO 165
Typical MS-1799 Builds (Compare 1,571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1799

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback