MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics43.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E12
MotherboardMSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)  (all builds)
Memory19.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '24 at 15:26
Run Duration78 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$475
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 92.8
1-Core 218
2-Core 436
130% 249 Pts
4-Core 853
8-Core 1606
147% 1,230 Pts
64-Core 3,658
226% 3,658 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 126%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1363) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.2% Average
Lighting 53.5
Reflection 58.4
Parallax 51.4
44% 54.4 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 48.2
Splatting 45.9
42% 52.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T700 M.2 1TB-$152
645GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 11,901
Write 11,170
Mixed 9,004
2,382% 10,692 MB/s
4K Read 554
4K Write 395
4K Mixed 458
1,636% 469 MB/s
DQ Read 1,828
DQ Write 1,159
DQ Mixed 1,399
1,068% 1,462 MB/s
Poor: 315% Great: 691%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
302% Outstanding
MC Read 192
MC Write 70.5
MC Mixed 93.3
339% 118 GB/s
SC Read 51.7
SC Write 74.2
SC Mixed 64.8
182% 63.6 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 162%
This bench: 302%
Great: 302%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 1R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 25% 16 217 57 60 23" 1920 1009 HWP289C HP 2310t
Typical MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12) Builds (Compare 163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 422%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $2,064
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback