Today's hottest deals

Asrock QC5000M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock QC5000M  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150507
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 01:00
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5050 APU
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.55 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
30.1% Below average
Memory 46.3
1-Core 23.2
2-Core 46.3
26% 38.6 Pts
4-Core 81.8
8-Core 82.3
11% 82.1 Pts
64-Core 81.4
5% 81.4 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
ASRock(1849 9832) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.5% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 2.4
1% 2.4 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 3
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.5%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HS17437
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 302 286 291 291 295 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 285
Write 313
Mixed 312
SusWrite 294
68% 301 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 19.3
67% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 132
94% 120 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 5.2
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 25 60 20" 1600 829 SAM0634 SMB2030N
Typical QC5000M Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock QC5000M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback