Today's hottest deals

HP p7-1054

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP p7-1054  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110504
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateJan 13 '18 at 20:00
Run Duration386 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 645
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 70.1
1-Core 45.5
2-Core 88.7
44% 68.1 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 145
20% 145 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
EVGA(3842 1450) 1GB
CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
8.61% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 8.5
8% 10 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 11.2
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.61%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 89.6
Write 88.8
Mixed 89.2
67% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.24
64% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 74%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
15GB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.04% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 6.98
Mixed 9.39
14% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.78
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.005
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 6.04%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1600G 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.7% Poor
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 11.3
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.9
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1054 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1054

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback