Today's hottest deals

Biostar H510MHP-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardBiostar H510MHP-E  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221111
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMay 21 '24 at 22:20
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 56
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 142
52% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 372
38% 308 Pts
64-Core 728
45% 728 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$390
Palit(1569 F308) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Lighting 212
Reflection 195
Parallax 215
172% 207 fps
MRender 305
Gravity 168
Splatting 126
154% 200 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 153%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Origin Inception TLC830 Pro NVMe 1TB
512GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APF1M3R1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1015 1054 63 1249 802 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,141
Write 2,028
Mixed 1513
SusWrite 708
306% 1,347 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 50.9
160% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 437
DQ Mixed 600
449% 606 MB/s
Poor: 166%
This bench: 166%
Great: 349%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HX50D416G32UDI 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.2% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 10.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 6.7
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 206
19% 206 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 27: 0P 2R 4G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
27% 28% 40 213 57 165 23.8" 1280 720 BNQ7FCC BenQ EX240N
Typical H510MHP-E Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

Motherboard: Biostar H510MHP-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback