Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B760M GAMING AC DDR4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive349% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760M GAMING AC DDR4  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '24 at 15:27
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700F-$312
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 73.9
1-Core 180
2-Core 336
104% 197 Pts
4-Core 654
8-Core 1,308
116% 981 Pts
64-Core 2134
132% 2134 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 125%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Origin Inception TLC830 Pro NVMe 1TB
553GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H230904a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2363 2336 2148 1285 1282 1267 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
349% Outstanding
Read 2,263
Write 2,518
Mixed 1,989
SusWrite 1,780
482% 2,137 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 95.1
317% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,400
DQ Write 917
DQ Mixed 931
756% 1,083 MB/s
Poor: 166%
This bench: 349%
Great: 349%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$54
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
70.9% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 25.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 20.3
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 32 144 0" 1280 720
Typical GA-B760M GAMING AC DDR4 Builds (Compare 162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760M GAMING AC DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback