Asus TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240418
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMay 23 '24 at 19:02
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700KF-$374
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 76.4
1-Core 230
2-Core 455
129% 254 Pts
4-Core 911
8-Core 1,771
159% 1341 Pts
64-Core 3,597
223% 3,597 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3431 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 180
Parallax 181
149% 181 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 157
Splatting 131
126% 157 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 133%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000T500SSD8 1TB
810GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P8CR002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,017
Write 4,166
Mixed 2,791
815% 3,658 MB/s
4K Read 73.3
4K Write 238
4K Mixed 110
378% 141 MB/s
DQ Read 1,686
DQ Write 1323
DQ Mixed 1502
1,124% 1,504 MB/s
Poor: 220% Great: 658%
CT2000T500SSD8 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: P8CR002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,444
Write 4,874
Mixed 3,010
916% 4,109 MB/s
4K Read 86.6
4K Write 273
4K Mixed 128
439% 162 MB/s
DQ Read 1,780
DQ Write 1,382
DQ Mixed 1,558
1,172% 1,574 MB/s
Poor: 252% Great: 682%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
201GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 509
Write 467
Mixed 446
106% 474 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 46.4
151% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 283
229% 325 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 216
Write 184
Mixed 85.6
119% 162 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.2
876% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CP16G60C36U5B.M8D1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
140% Outstanding
MC Read 55.9
MC Write 53.6
MC Mixed 52
154% 53.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 50.9
SC Mixed 26.8
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 140%
Great: 198%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 0P 2R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 23% 31 197 18 165 27" 1280 720 SAM7181 Odyssey G50A
Typical TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 276%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $943
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback