Today's hottest deals

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 148%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X470 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory33.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210329
Uptime10 Days
Run DateJun 04 '24 at 05:08
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$166
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 66.5
1-Core 167
2-Core 329
97% 187 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 985
98% 798 Pts
64-Core 1,452
90% 1,452 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$993
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.44
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
167% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 623
Parallax 428
117% 398 fps
MRender 534
Gravity 404
Splatting 265
313% 401 fps
Poor: 283%
This bench: 167%
Great: 314%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 141 138 124 112 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 483
Write 143
Mixed 187
SusWrite 128
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 37.1
150% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 200
167% 249 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
78GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 425 417 414 322 285 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 482
Mixed 399
SusWrite 390
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 58.1
194% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 371
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 121%
Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$65
23GB free
Firmware: 1B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,816
Write 1,727
Mixed 754
317% 1,432 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 53.5
189% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,096
DQ Write 870
DQ Mixed 783
640% 916 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
CT2000P3PSSD8 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2456 2541 2522 2538 2537 2541 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
367% Outstanding
Read 1,905
Write 2555
Mixed 2,076
SusWrite 2,522
514% 2,265 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 81.8
283% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,254
DQ Write 943
DQ Mixed 1,075
810% 1,090 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 367%
Great: 517%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
126GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 130 122 121 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 99
Write 140
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 125
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.6
206% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 90%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 494GB
1GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 113
Write 60.3
Mixed 58.9
89% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
106% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 38%
SanDisk 3.2 Gen1 501GB
321GB free, PID 55b1
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 69 65 71 69 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 99.3
Write 1.2
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 66.4
79% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1
86% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M2D3600C18 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 24.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 24.5
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B7F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 675 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $771
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback