Apple MacPro7,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-27AD2F918AE68F61
Memory371.1 GB free of 384 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '24 at 13:23
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3265M
CPU0, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.1% Very good
Memory 69.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 207
70% 127 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 820
73% 615 Pts
64-Core 3,359
208% 3,359 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 580X
Apple(106B 0206) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1710 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.44.07
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.7% Average
Lighting 62.8
Reflection 56.4
Parallax 80.6
51% 66.6 fps
MRender 57.9
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 41.6
44% 55.4 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP8192 8TB
879GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 130
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1624 1479 1514 1639 1665 1658 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA8GR7AJR4N-WM 6x31.8GB
6 of 12 slots used
191GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
153% Outstanding
MC Read 54.1
MC Write 76.6
MC Mixed 62.6
184% 64.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 8.6
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 153%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 1450 874 60 27" 1280 720 DELA0D0 Dell S2716DG
Typical MacPro7,1 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Apple MacPro7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback