Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA607PI_FA607PI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA607PI_FA607PI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA607PI
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '24 at 03:53
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX Graphics
FL1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 75.8
1-Core 171
2-Core 340
102% 196 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 939
84% 707 Pts
64-Core 2,847
176% 2,847 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 610M
Asus(1043 3628) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.38.09
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
7.98% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 13.3
6% 11.4 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 8
Splatting 21.7
12% 13.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.98%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1102 1TB
855GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 74114000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,724
Write 2,124
Mixed 1,828
494% 2,225 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 46.8
158% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,124
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 775
559% 743 MB/s
Poor: 203% Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4PB0-CWMOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
124% Outstanding
MC Read 69.7
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 36.4
131% 45.9 GB/s
SC Read 37.8
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 35.6
104% 36.5 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 124%
Great: 149%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 60 16" 1280 720 CSW1632 MNG007DA5-1
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA607PI_FA607PI Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 176%
UFO

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA607PI_FA607PI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback