Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83FQ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83FQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory12.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '24 at 19:09
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i5-12450HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 61.6
1-Core 166
2-Core 321
95% 183 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 752
82% 648 Pts
64-Core 911
56% 911 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3D16) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4679
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
3.98% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 4.6
3% 5.33 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 6
5% 6.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.98%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKCD512QFM-1BD1AABLA 512GB
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1002V3LN
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,241
Write 1,357
Mixed 1,158
280% 1,252 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 24.5
168% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,016
DQ Write 678
DQ Mixed 845
631% 846 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSB3400KB06IVF-4800 2x12GB
2 of 2 slots used
24GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 38.6
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 21.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 103%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUO7EAD
Typical 83FQ Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 83FQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback