Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 169%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 160%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics187% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 28 '24 at 20:41
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 148
2-Core 293
99% 179 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 894
83% 691 Pts
64-Core 1,151
71% 1,151 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
ASRock(1849 5230) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.7.1
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
187% Outstanding
Lighting 236
Reflection 246
Parallax 440
192% 307 fps
MRender 374
Gravity 211
Splatting 301
241% 295 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 187%
Great: 214%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,313
Write 1,470
Mixed 1,231
368% 1,671 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 68.8
226% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 966
DQ Write 657
DQ Mixed 844
621% 822 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$80
728GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 134 138 136 139 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 158
Write 179
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 137
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$38
148GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 65 64 66 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 67.9
Write 74.5
Mixed 39
SusWrite 63.8
45% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 62%
Amd-raid WDS500G3X0C-00SJ 500GB
170GB free
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 46 44 44 45 44 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 290%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 113 113 112 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 123
Write 124
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 112
143% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 61%
USB DISK 3.0 124GB
115GB free, PID 6700
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 16 13 5.4 5.6 7.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
6.79% Terrible
Read 6.7
Write 7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 8.9
9% 6.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.79%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2D3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2D3200C16 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.8% Outstanding
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 29
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 40.6
SC Mixed 29.4
86% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 54.8
73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 165 27" 1280 720 ACR0919 XZ272U V
Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $681
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback