Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PHN16-72

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics5.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive494% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PHN16-72  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL EQE_RTX
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '24 at 05:57
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 77.6
1-Core 212
2-Core 412
121% 234 Pts
4-Core 796
8-Core 1,343
130% 1,070 Pts
64-Core 2,558
158% 2,558 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 113%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1731) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5081
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
5.89% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 13
9% 13.4 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.27 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.89%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3500_MTFDKBA512TGD-1BK15ABYY 512GB
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P8MA001 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4372 2980 1021 997 1034 1112 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
494% Outstanding
Read 4,850
Write 4,536
Mixed 3,118
SusWrite 1,919
806% 3,606 MB/s
4K Read 82.6
4K Write 288
4K Mixed 96.7
402% 156 MB/s
DQ Read 1,594
DQ Write 1,143
DQ Mixed 1,324
1,001% 1,354 MB/s
Poor: 303%
This bench: 494%
Great: 494%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR56S46BS8HA-16KM Crucial CT16G56C46S5.M8G1 32GB
5600, 5600 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
166% Outstanding
MC Read 71.5
MC Write 61.3
MC Mixed 63.8
187% 65.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 47.3
SC Mixed 28.4
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 165 16" 1280 720 CSO160B
Typical Predator PHN16-72 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator PHN16-72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback